RayPals/Claro
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

test: cover missing method field values

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Hermes Agent
2026-09-21 17:51:04 +00:00
parent b1eba07cf1
commit f590b01bfe
6 changed files with 21 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/CURRENT_STATUS.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ Ready now:
- Direct object-field validation also has positive coverage for explicit `NUMBER`, `TEXT`, and `YESNO` annotations, such as `SET player.ready YESNO YES`, plus the compatibility-shaped `AS ... TO` form such as `SET player.score AS NUMBER TO 10`, while the shorter unannotated form remains supported; method-body field assignments have matching positive coverage for both modern and compatibility `TEACH` forms using `SET score AS NUMBER TO 10`, and those two `AS ... TO` method fixtures are now included in `claro validate`; conflicting annotations such as `SET player.score TEXT "oops"` explain the class-declared type and how to repair it, and unknown annotations such as `SET player.score AS BANANA TO 10` or `SET player.score BANANA 10` identify the invalid type and suggest the declared field type.
Still needed:
- Keep the focused typecheck validator's fixture list complete as new positive and negative examples are added. `claro validate` now executes the complete focused fixture matrix as well, so release validation cannot silently omit a listed typecheck example.
- Keep the focused typecheck validator's fixture list complete as new positive and negative examples are added. `claro validate` now executes the complete focused fixture matrix as well, so release validation cannot silently omit a listed typecheck example. Short explicitly typed field assignments inside methods also have focused coverage: `SET score NUMBER` explains that one value expression is required after the type, matching direct object-field assignment guidance.
- The expression checker now carries a known TEXT operand through all arithmetic operators so object-field and typed-function-return diagnostics do not hide addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division mistakes; focused numeric-subtraction, numeric-division, and numeric-multiplication positives plus text-operand addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division negatives protect this behavior. Typed-function return diagnostics now have focused subtraction and division positives alongside multiplication coverage. Text concatenation into a TEXT field has focused positive fixtures for both operand orders, including concatenation of two TEXT object fields. Each numeric operator names the text operand and explains that it needs NUMBER values.
- Method return validation now has focused positive subtraction and division fixtures alongside the existing arithmetic return coverage, including compatibility `TAKES` / `LEARNED` subtraction and division cases, so checked NUMBER method parameters and numeric subtraction or division remain accepted by the release validator in both method spellings.
- Modern and compatibility `TAKES` / `LEARNED` methods have positive NUMBER, TEXT, and YESNO field-assignment coverage, and modern plus compatibility method-body `CHECK TYPE` metadata now have positive YESNO coverage beside the wrong-value diagnostics.