package: require a project manifest name
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ claro package doctor
|
||||
claro package lock
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The v1.18.26 package command is a safer local project-file helper. It creates `claro.project`, `claro.lock`, and local folders under `packages/`. Package names may appear only once in `claro.project`; `claro package doctor` reports duplicate entries so the lockfile stays unambiguous. It is not yet an online package registry.
|
||||
The v1.18.26 package command is a safer local project-file helper. It creates `claro.project`, `claro.lock`, and local folders under `packages/`. Package names may appear only once in `claro.project`; `claro package doctor` reports duplicate entries so the lockfile stays unambiguous. It also requires the project manifest to have exactly one non-empty `name:` field. It is not yet an online package registry.
|
||||
|
||||
## IDE metadata
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ Ready now:
|
||||
- lockfile package entries must also be unique; `claro package doctor` reports duplicate lock entries instead of accepting ambiguous package/checksum data
|
||||
- package manifest `name:` entries must also be unique; `claro package doctor` reports `BAD package manifest name` instead of accepting ambiguous package identity data
|
||||
- package manifest `checksum:` entries must also be unique; `claro package doctor` reports `BAD package checksum` instead of accepting ambiguous integrity data
|
||||
- project manifests must contain exactly one non-empty `name:` field; `claro package doctor` reports `BAD project manifest name: expected a non-empty name` when the project identity is missing or blank
|
||||
|
||||
Still needed:
|
||||
- install from local path
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ See `CURRENT_STATUS.md` for the detailed feature matrix.
|
||||
1. Keep beginner-facing docs current and separate from historical release notes.
|
||||
2. Keep examples aligned with the modern simple syntax (`END`, `DO`, short `SET`, short `ASK`) while documenting older compatibility forms separately.
|
||||
3. Expand validation around typecheck diagnostics and package/networking safety. Current Forgejo/Gitea CI runs the documented release gates (`claro validate`, typecheck diagnostics validation, version convention validation, package security validation, and CI workflow coverage validation). Current package safety validation covers safe project creation, rejecting unsafe project names during `claro new`, safe manifest/lockfile creation, rejecting unsafe package names during `package add`, detecting unsafe package names already present in `claro.project` during `package doctor`, refusing to write lockfile data for unsafe package names during `package lock`, making `package list` fail instead of displaying unsafe package entries as normal package names, making `package init` fail instead of reporting the project ready when unsafe package names are already present, making `package add` fail before changing files when unsafe package names are already present, making `package remove` fail instead of reporting success when unsafe package names remain during lockfile refresh, allowing `package remove` to remove an exact unsafe package entry so learners can repair a bad `claro.project`, making `package doctor` reject stale lockfile checksums for listed packages, and making `package doctor` reject lockfile package entries that are not listed in `claro.project`. Current function validation covers correct checked calls, wrong-type arguments, missing checked-argument diagnostics, missing unchecked-argument diagnostics for simple functions in both modern `DO greet` and empty compatibility `CALL greet WITH` forms, extra-argument diagnostics, and beginner-facing unknown-function diagnostics for mistyped modern `DO` and compatibility `CALL ... WITH` calls; current object-method parameter validation covers correct modern `DO object.method ...` and compatibility `CALL object.method WITH ...` checked calls, wrong-type diagnostics for both call forms, checked methods after another method in the same class, missing and extra checked-argument diagnostics including the extra-argument case for a checked method after another method in the same class, missing unchecked-argument diagnostics for simple object methods, missing-object guidance when `DO player.method ...` or compatibility `CALL object.method WITH ...` appears before `NEW` even if the method name is also wrong, and class-specific unknown-method diagnostics for both modern and compatibility calls when a learner calls a method the class does not declare; current object-field validation covers direct NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO field-assignment positives, direct object-field `CHECK TYPE` metadata positives for NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO fields, negative NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO field metadata mismatches, NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO-expectation unknown-field `CHECK TYPE` diagnostics, direct wrong-type field assignment diagnostics, field collection when a `HAS` field appears after a simple method, direct unknown-field diagnostics for NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO values, a beginner-facing fallback for unknown fields assigned from expressions whose type is not inferable yet, and missing-object diagnostics for both `SET object.field value` and `CHECK TYPE object.field IS TYPE` before `NEW`.
|
||||
3a. Keep package validation honest by checking that the project and each listed package manifest declare the exact supported manifest version, package version, local source, and expected package name.
|
||||
3a. Keep package validation honest by checking that the project manifest has one non-empty project name, and that the project and each listed package manifest declare the exact supported manifest version, package version, local source, and expected package name.
|
||||
3b. Keep package security validation in Forgejo/Gitea CI so unsafe names, exact manifest-version/name/checksum mismatches, missing manifests, duplicate project packages, duplicate lock packages, duplicate package manifest names and checksums, and lockfile errors remain release blockers.
|
||||
4. Add small examples for each foundation feature before adding bigger syntax.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user