test: cover division text operand diagnostics
This commit is contained in:
@@ -109,6 +109,16 @@ SET player.score player.score * player.name
|
|||||||
Type mismatch for field player.score: expected NUMBER, but this value looks like TEXT.
|
Type mismatch for field player.score: expected NUMBER, but this value looks like TEXT.
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Division is covered in the same way:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```claro
|
||||||
|
SET player.score player.score / player.name
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
Type mismatch for field player.score: expected NUMBER, but this value looks like TEXT.
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The expression checker still deliberately reports only the type it can infer; full operator-specific rules remain future work.
|
The expression checker still deliberately reports only the type it can infer; full operator-specific rules remain future work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
`CHECK TYPE` also preserves TEXT field metadata through the same chained aliases:
|
`CHECK TYPE` also preserves TEXT field metadata through the same chained aliases:
|
||||||
|
|||||||
+1
-1
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ See `CURRENT_STATUS.md` for the detailed feature matrix.
|
|||||||
3b. Keep package security validation in Forgejo/Gitea CI so unsafe names, exact manifest-version/name/version/checksum mismatches, missing manifests, duplicate project manifest versions and packages, duplicate lock packages, duplicate package manifest names, versions, and checksums, and lockfile errors remain release blockers.
|
3b. Keep package security validation in Forgejo/Gitea CI so unsafe names, exact manifest-version/name/version/checksum mismatches, missing manifests, duplicate project manifest versions and packages, duplicate lock packages, duplicate package manifest names, versions, and checksums, and lockfile errors remain release blockers.
|
||||||
4. Add small examples for each foundation feature before adding bigger syntax. The object-field foundation now includes positive and negative validation for field expressions such as `SET player.score player.name`, `SET player.score player.score + 1`, `SET player.name player.score + 1`, explicitly typed field assignments, simple and chained aliases such as `SET alias player`, `SET backup alias`, followed by `SET backup.score ...` or `CHECK TYPE backup.score IS ...`, chained aliases in object-method calls through both modern `DO` and compatibility `CALL ... WITH` forms (including a dedicated positive modern `DO` fixture), and arithmetic/text expression mismatches; typed containers also accept a map with nested type metadata when it is added to a `LIST OF MAP`; broader alias/control-flow checking remains planned.
|
4. Add small examples for each foundation feature before adding bigger syntax. The object-field foundation now includes positive and negative validation for field expressions such as `SET player.score player.name`, `SET player.score player.score + 1`, `SET player.name player.score + 1`, explicitly typed field assignments, simple and chained aliases such as `SET alias player`, `SET backup alias`, followed by `SET backup.score ...` or `CHECK TYPE backup.score IS ...`, chained aliases in object-method calls through both modern `DO` and compatibility `CALL ... WITH` forms (including a dedicated positive modern `DO` fixture), and arithmetic/text expression mismatches; typed containers also accept a map with nested type metadata when it is added to a `LIST OF MAP`; broader alias/control-flow checking remains planned.
|
||||||
5. Keep the focused typecheck validator complete: every `typecheck_*.claro` fixture, including positive fixtures, must be exercised by release validation.
|
5. Keep the focused typecheck validator complete: every `typecheck_*.claro` fixture, including positive fixtures, must be exercised by release validation.
|
||||||
6. Continue narrowing expression diagnostics: known TEXT operands now remain visible through non-concatenation arithmetic, with focused subtraction and multiplication coverage; operator-specific guidance is still future work.
|
6. Continue narrowing expression diagnostics: known TEXT operands now remain visible through non-concatenation arithmetic, with focused subtraction, multiplication, and division coverage; operator-specific guidance is still future work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Complete-platform milestones
|
## Complete-platform milestones
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
|||||||
|
CLASS Player
|
||||||
|
HAS name TEXT
|
||||||
|
HAS score NUMBER
|
||||||
|
END
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
NEW Player player
|
||||||
|
SET player.name "Ada"
|
||||||
|
SET player.score player.score / player.name
|
||||||
@@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ EXPECTED = {
|
|||||||
"tests/typecheck_object_field_multiplication_bad.claro": [
|
"tests/typecheck_object_field_multiplication_bad.claro": [
|
||||||
"tests/typecheck_object_field_multiplication_bad.claro:8: Type mismatch for field player.score: expected NUMBER, but this value looks like TEXT.",
|
"tests/typecheck_object_field_multiplication_bad.claro:8: Type mismatch for field player.score: expected NUMBER, but this value looks like TEXT.",
|
||||||
],
|
],
|
||||||
|
"tests/typecheck_object_field_division_bad.claro": [
|
||||||
|
"tests/typecheck_object_field_division_bad.claro:8: Type mismatch for field player.score: expected NUMBER, but this value looks like TEXT.",
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
"tests/typecheck_object_field_text_expression_bad.claro": [
|
"tests/typecheck_object_field_text_expression_bad.claro": [
|
||||||
"tests/typecheck_object_field_text_expression_bad.claro:8: Type mismatch for field player.name: expected TEXT, but this value looks like NUMBER.",
|
"tests/typecheck_object_field_text_expression_bad.claro:8: Type mismatch for field player.name: expected TEXT, but this value looks like NUMBER.",
|
||||||
],
|
],
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user