typecheck: clarify missing CHECK TYPE expression

docs/CURRENT_STATUS.md

@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ Ready now:
 - `TYPE OF` and `CHECK TYPE`
 - `CHECK TYPE` gives a direct repair hint when the learner forgets the `IS` keyword, for example `CHECK TYPE score` reports `CHECK TYPE needs IS. Try: CHECK TYPE score IS NUMBER.`
 - `CHECK TYPE` gives a direct repair hint when `IS` has no expected type, for example `CHECK TYPE score IS` reports `CHECK TYPE score needs a type after IS. Try: CHECK TYPE score IS NUMBER.`
+- `CHECK TYPE` explains when the learner leaves out the expression as well, for example bare `CHECK TYPE` reports `CHECK TYPE needs an expression, IS, and a type. Try: CHECK TYPE score IS NUMBER.`
 - `CHECK TYPE` rejects extra words after a valid expected type with a direct repair hint, so `CHECK TYPE score IS NUMBER TEXT` explains that only one type belongs in the check
 - `CHECK TYPE` rejects unknown expected type names with a beginner-facing list of supported types
 - typed list/map checks through `claro typecheck`, including a nested `LIST OF MAP` insertion example

docs/ROADMAP.md

@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ Keep declared return types honest: `claro typecheck` now reports friendly diagno
 8q.1. Keep `CHECK TYPE` declarations understandable: `CHECK TYPE score IS` now gets a direct repair hint naming the missing expected type and showing a complete example.
 
 8q.2. Keep `CHECK TYPE` declarations unambiguous: extra words after a valid expected type now get a direct repair hint instead of being reported as an unknown type.
+8q.3. Keep `CHECK TYPE` declarations complete: a bare `CHECK TYPE` now explains that the expression, `IS`, and expected type are all required, with a complete repair example.
 
 ### 1. Strong static types