typecheck: diagnose missing TO in field annotations
This commit is contained in:
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ Keep declared return types honest: `claro typecheck` now reports friendly diagno
|
||||
8d.5. Keep short direct field assignments unambiguous: `SET player.score NUMBER 10 extra` now rejects trailing words with a repair hint, matching the separated `AS ... TO` form.
|
||||
8d.6. Keep separated direct field assignments complete: `SET player.score AS NUMBER TO` now explains that one value expression is required after `TO`.
|
||||
8d.7. Keep short direct field assignments complete: `SET player.score NUMBER` now explains that one value expression is required after the type.
|
||||
8d.8. Keep separated direct field assignments structurally complete: `SET player.score AS NUMBER` now explains that `TO` must appear before the value, with a complete repair example.
|
||||
8e. Keep inline method-field annotation coverage aligned across syntax generations: compatibility `TAKES` / `LEARNED` methods now have matching positive and negative fixtures, so older lessons retain the same class-declared-type guidance.
|
||||
8f. Keep inline method-field annotations learner-facing: an unknown annotation such as `BANANA` now names the field and method and suggests the `HAS` type instead of silently treating the annotation as an expression.
|
||||
8g. Keep unknown inline method-field annotation diagnostics aligned across syntax generations: compatibility `TAKES` / `LEARNED` methods now have matching focused coverage for misspelled annotations.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user