feat: improve unknown object field expression diagnostic

docs/ADVANCED_STATIC_TYPING.md

@@ -174,6 +174,12 @@ Object Player has no field nickname. Check the field name or add HAS nickname TE
 Object Player has no field ready. Check the field name or add HAS ready YESNO to the class.
 ```
 
+When the value is an expression whose type is not known yet, Claro now avoids the internal `ANY` placeholder and gives a plain next step instead:
+
+```text
+Object Player has no field level. Check the field name or add the field to the class with the right type.
+```
+
 Direct `CHECK TYPE` on an undeclared field uses the expected type from the check in its suggestion:
 
 ```claro
@@ -234,7 +240,7 @@ Output:
 Object player is not known yet. Create it with NEW ClassName player before setting player.score.
 ```
 
-Both sides of this narrow field foundation are covered by validation: `tests/typecheck_object_field_good.claro` checks that `SET player.score 10` is accepted for a `HAS score NUMBER` field, `tests/typecheck_object_field_text_good.claro` checks that `SET player.name "Ada"` is accepted for a `HAS name TEXT` field, `tests/typecheck_object_field_yesno_good.claro` checks that `SET player.ready YES` is accepted for a `HAS ready YESNO` field, `tests/typecheck_object_field_unknown_object_bad.claro` checks that `SET player.score 10` before `NEW Player player` reports the missing-object assignment diagnostic, `tests/typecheck_object_field_check_type_unknown_object_bad.claro` checks the matching missing-object `CHECK TYPE` diagnostic, and the remaining object-field fixtures cover known-field mismatches plus unknown NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO fields.
+Both sides of this narrow field foundation are covered by validation: `tests/typecheck_object_field_good.claro` checks that `SET player.score 10` is accepted for a `HAS score NUMBER` field, `tests/typecheck_object_field_text_good.claro` checks that `SET player.name "Ada"` is accepted for a `HAS name TEXT` field, `tests/typecheck_object_field_yesno_good.claro` checks that `SET player.ready YES` is accepted for a `HAS ready YESNO` field, `tests/typecheck_object_field_unknown_object_bad.claro` checks that `SET player.score 10` before `NEW Player player` reports the missing-object assignment diagnostic, `tests/typecheck_object_field_check_type_unknown_object_bad.claro` checks the matching missing-object `CHECK TYPE` diagnostic, and the remaining object-field fixtures cover known-field mismatches, unknown NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO fields, and unknown-field assignments whose value type is not inferable yet.
 
 This slice is intentionally small: it covers direct `NEW Class object` plus `SET object.field value` cases in one file. Broader object flows, aliases, method return checks, and richer object signatures remain future work.
 

docs/CURRENT_STATUS.md

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Ready now:
 - `TYPE OF` and `CHECK TYPE`
 - typed list/map checks through `claro typecheck`
 - a narrow function/method argument check: `CHECK TYPE parameter IS TYPE` inside a function or simple object method lets `claro typecheck` accept correct checked calls and catch mismatched `DO`, `CALL ... WITH`, and `DO object.method ...` arguments
-- a narrow object-field assignment/check-type check for simple `NEW Class object` plus direct `SET object.field value` and `CHECK TYPE object.field IS TYPE` cases when the class declares `HAS field TYPE`; validation now covers correct NUMBER, TEXT, and YESNO direct assignments, direct `CHECK TYPE` metadata acceptance for NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO fields, negative NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO field `CHECK TYPE` metadata mismatches, NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO-expectation unknown-field `CHECK TYPE` diagnostics, missing-object field assignment and `CHECK TYPE` diagnostics, NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO wrong-type diagnostics, plus NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO-valued unknown-field diagnostics for direct assignments to undeclared fields
+- a narrow object-field assignment/check-type check for simple `NEW Class object` plus direct `SET object.field value` and `CHECK TYPE object.field IS TYPE` cases when the class declares `HAS field TYPE`; validation now covers correct NUMBER, TEXT, and YESNO direct assignments, direct `CHECK TYPE` metadata acceptance for NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO fields, negative NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO field `CHECK TYPE` metadata mismatches, NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO-expectation unknown-field `CHECK TYPE` diagnostics, missing-object field assignment and `CHECK TYPE` diagnostics, NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO wrong-type diagnostics, NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO-valued unknown-field diagnostics for direct assignments to undeclared fields, plus a plain beginner-facing unknown-field diagnostic when the assigned expression type is not inferable yet
 
 Still needed:
 - richer typed function signatures and return values

docs/ROADMAP.md

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ See `CURRENT_STATUS.md` for the detailed feature matrix.
 
 1. Keep beginner-facing docs current and separate from historical release notes.
 2. Keep examples aligned with the modern simple syntax (`END`, `DO`, short `SET`, short `ASK`) while documenting older compatibility forms separately.
-3. Expand validation around typecheck diagnostics and package/networking safety. Current object-method parameter validation covers one correct `DO object.method ...` call and one wrong-type diagnostic; object-field validation covers correct NUMBER, TEXT, and YESNO direct `SET object.field value` assignments, direct `CHECK TYPE` metadata acceptance for NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO fields, negative NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO metadata mismatches, NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO-expectation unknown-field `CHECK TYPE` diagnostics, missing-object field assignment and `CHECK TYPE` diagnostics, NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO wrong-type direct assignments, and simple NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO-valued unknown-field diagnostics after `NEW Class object`.
+3. Expand validation around typecheck diagnostics and package/networking safety. Current object-method parameter validation covers one correct `DO object.method ...` call and one wrong-type diagnostic; object-field validation covers correct NUMBER, TEXT, and YESNO direct `SET object.field value` assignments, direct `CHECK TYPE` metadata acceptance for NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO fields, negative NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO metadata mismatches, NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO-expectation unknown-field `CHECK TYPE` diagnostics, missing-object field assignment and `CHECK TYPE` diagnostics, NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO wrong-type direct assignments, simple NUMBER/TEXT/YESNO-valued unknown-field diagnostics after `NEW Class object`, and a beginner-facing fallback when the unknown field's assigned expression type is not inferable yet.
 4. Add small examples for each foundation feature before adding bigger syntax.
 
 ## Complete-platform milestones