test: cover compatibility method text concatenation

2026-09-14 22:01:51 +00:00
parent 7a165f8125
commit 43d596d85b
7 changed files with 33 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ Keep declared return types honest: `claro typecheck` now reports friendly diagno
 7. Keep method-body field diagnostics learner-facing: typed methods now name the class method when a simple class field receives a known mismatch in `CHECK TYPE` or assignment, or a known TEXT operand in a NUMBER expression, with matching text and numeric coverage in modern and compatibility method syntax; direct assignments to undeclared method fields now report the missing field when the value type is known, and bare `CHECK TYPE missing IS TYPE` statements inside methods now use the expected type in the repair hint in both modern and compatibility method syntax; broader control-flow and object-flow analysis remains planned.
 8: Keep method-body coverage balanced across beginner field types and syntax generations: YESNO field assignment mismatches are now validated for both modern `DO` and compatibility `CALL ... WITH` method syntax, method-body `CHECK TYPE` metadata mismatches now have matching compatibility `TAKES` / `LEARNED` coverage alongside the modern form, compatibility YESNO field metadata has dedicated positive and negative fixtures, and compatibility method assignments to undeclared fields have the same focused missing-field diagnostic as modern methods, including a beginner-facing fallback when the assigned expression is not inferable yet.
 8a. Keep method-body text expressions balanced: modern TEXT field concatenation is covered when the field is on either side of `+`, so both common beginner word-order patterns remain accepted.
+8b. Keep compatibility method-body text expressions aligned: `TAKES` / `LEARNED` methods now have positive TEXT concatenation coverage in both operand orders beside the modern `TEACH` / `END` examples.

 ### 1. Strong static types