test: cover text field concatenation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Ready now:
|
||||
|
||||
Still needed:
|
||||
- Keep the focused typecheck validator's fixture list complete as new positive and negative examples are added.
|
||||
- The expression checker now carries a known TEXT operand through all arithmetic operators so object-field diagnostics do not hide addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division mistakes; focused numeric-subtraction, numeric-division, and numeric-multiplication positives plus text-operand addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division negatives protect this behavior. Text concatenation into a TEXT field has focused positive fixtures for both operand orders. Each numeric operator names the text operand and explains that it needs NUMBER values.
|
||||
- The expression checker now carries a known TEXT operand through all arithmetic operators so object-field diagnostics do not hide addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division mistakes; focused numeric-subtraction, numeric-division, and numeric-multiplication positives plus text-operand addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division negatives protect this behavior. Text concatenation into a TEXT field has focused positive fixtures for both operand orders, including concatenation of two TEXT object fields. Each numeric operator names the text operand and explains that it needs NUMBER values.
|
||||
- richer typed function signatures and return values
|
||||
- type checking through branches and loops
|
||||
- richer object field type checking beyond simple direct assignments
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user