test: cover text concatenation in object fields
This commit is contained in:
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Ready now:
|
||||
|
||||
Still needed:
|
||||
- Keep the focused typecheck validator's fixture list complete as new positive and negative examples are added.
|
||||
- The expression checker now carries a known TEXT operand through all arithmetic operators so object-field diagnostics do not hide addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division mistakes; focused numeric-subtraction, numeric-division, and numeric-multiplication positives plus text-operand addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division negatives protect this behavior. Each operator names the text operand and explains that it needs NUMBER values.
|
||||
- The expression checker now carries a known TEXT operand through all arithmetic operators so object-field diagnostics do not hide addition, subtraction, multiplication, or division mistakes; focused numeric-subtraction, numeric-division, and numeric-multiplication positives plus text-operand addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division negatives protect this behavior. Text concatenation into a TEXT field also has a focused positive fixture. Each numeric operator names the text operand and explains that it needs NUMBER values.
|
||||
- richer typed function signatures and return values
|
||||
- type checking through branches and loops
|
||||
- richer object field type checking beyond simple direct assignments
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user